This user page was nominated for deletion on 29 December 2023 but was kept.
If you are thinking about re-nominating it for deletion, please read that discussion first.

en-N	This user has a native understanding of English.

en-US-N	This user has a native understanding of American English.

es-1	Este usuario tiene un conocimiento básico del español.

Welcome to my user talk page!

Current Monthly Archive

(redlinked the first week
or more of each month):

2025/March

Past Monthly Archives

Newly registered and IP editors may leave messages at the bottom of this page.

"Vandalism" Claim

Why are you going around and claiming that I "vandalized" by removing a redundant split template, that was from my own file? that was from a rude Chilean IP. Every single edit done by him was targeted towards me, and yet you mark my reverts of their blatant edits as vandalism? That's unreasonable. It would be greatly appreciated if a reply is done. 🗽Freedoxm🗽 (talk) 17:36, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Freedoxm: I did not "go around", I went directly to your user talk page. The split template was not redundant. You reacted badly to two edits with vulgarity. Did you not overwrite those files? What did that IP do that point that you considered rude? You also removed a delete template out of process and closed the DR inappropriately. I stand by my accusation of vandalism. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 20:48, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I only reacted with vulgarity with these two edits, because I was deeply frustrated and couldn't get it out of my mind. Vulgarity is not vandalism. I understand that it was probably offensive, but I did not direct it towards anyone, I was just frustrated because right after that the IP added that overwrite template they opened a request asking one of my files to be deleted. On the "inappropriate closing", Why are you defending that IP? All of their edits were harassment towards me. They were warned by another user, but despite that they have decided to randomly delete another file of mine with a similar reason. They called it a useless piece that should be deleted because it was "signed" in a "boring staff meeting". You should have also warned them that their deletion reason was inappropriate too. What reason is there to "split" files that cannot be split? Cut them in half? As you stand by whatever it is, your defense of that IP and siding with them that it was created in a "boring staff meeting" and your defense of my "vandalism", All of that IP and related IP's edits were all towards me, and yet you continue to defend them no matter what. As your result, I will also have to stand by my decision that this was not vandalism. I was just frustrated. 🗽Freedoxm🗽 (talk) 21:01, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Freedoxm: Files are split by taking the new disparate uploads and giving them their own filenames and file description pages. I am defending this project. IPs have just as much right to template and nominate as you do. Perhaps you should not edit while deeply frustrated. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 21:09, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, but does it give them the right to personally attack me via the reason by deletion requests? You're giving them the green light to delete whatever image they want and even defend them despite the personal attacks. 🗽Freedoxm🗽 (talk) 21:13, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Freedoxm: They called your sketch stupid, not you personally. That is not a personal attack. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 21:19, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Still doesn't give them the right to call it stupid, even if they despise it. 🗽Freedoxm🗽 (talk) 21:20, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Introduction to templates on Wikipedia.webm

I'm planning to make a similar video, in Vietnamese, for editors of the Vietnamese Wikipedia to watch. I can write down the script based on what the person in the video says and then translate it into Vietnamese. However, since I don't want to use my real voice, I'd like to ask if I can use AI-generated or voice-altered audio for the video. If yes, what tag(s) can I use? Thanks! Phương Linh (talk) 05:00, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Hide on Rosé: Yes, you may explain in the description and use {{Derived from}} and {{Derivative versions}}. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 18:09, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chiều trên đập thủy-điện Nà-hang, 08-12-2017 (b).jpg This is a image of C/Đăng Đàn Cung/Musée Annam. Should we do something with the file related to this globally banned user? Phương Linh (talk) 04:06, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Hide on Rosé: Print it and use it for target practice? — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:11, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I mean… the person in that image is a globally banned user. Should we delete it? Phương Linh (talk) 10:31, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Hide on Rosé: I think so, but you would have to find a willing Admin to do it. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:20, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope images

Hello Jeff, if you ask me these are all out of scope images only. Would you take a closer look? Thank you so much. Lotje (talk) 17:31, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Lotje: See the second section of Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Zjfldaldk. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 18:06, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Jeff, you really know every little corner of Commons.

The thing is, I wonder why this user (from Marseille if i am correct) keeps uploading these kind of files. Cheers Lotje (talk) 04:36, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Lotje: Fake association football fan? — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 10:13, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]